Bombay High Court
WP/13938/2026 of TEHSIN SHABBIR SHAIKH Vs THE APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE-II THR CHAIRMAN SRA AND ORS on 16 October 2026
13938-26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13938 OF 2026 Tehsin Shabbir Shaikh … Petitioner Versus The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee-II & Ors. ... Respondents __________________________ Ms. Abhijit Patil for the Petitioner.
905-wp 13938-26.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13938 OF 2026
Tehsin Shabbir Shaikh
… Petitioner
Versus
The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee-II & Ors.
... Respondents
__________________________
Ms. Abhijit Patil for the Petitioner.
Smt. P. H. Kantharia for Respondent No.1-AGRC.
Mr. Milind More for the Respondent-SRA.
Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl GP a/w. Mr. A. K. Naik, AGP for the Respondent-State.
__________________________
CORAM
: M. S. KARNIK AND
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATED
: 16
th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Smt. Kantharia, learned counsel for the respondent No.1- AGRC submitted that the petitioner (appellant before the AGRC) has not been held to be eligible as his name is not reflected in the Annexure-II. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the premises in question were purchased by him and therefore no proceedings for eviction under Section 33/38 could have been Amk 1/2 905-wp 13938-26.doc initiated. According to him, it is the only proceeding under Section 3E can be justified.
3. We are not making any observation as the final order is yet to be uploaded by the AGRC. Considering that the eviction notice is to take effect today, we are inclined to grant limited protection to the petitioner in the interest of justice. Till the order of the AGRC is uploaded, the petitioner not to be evicted.
4. The AGRC not to be influenced by any observations that we have made or the limited protection granted by us. The AGRC to pass the order on its own merits.
5. The petition is disposed of. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) Amk 2/2