Bombay High Court

ALP/283/2016 of PRIYESH BHEDA Vs VIJAYA NADAR AND ANR on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ALP) NO.283 OF 2016 Priyesh Bheda … Applicant Versus Vijaya Nadar and anr … Respondents *** None for Applicant. Mr. Swapnil Pednekar, APP for Respondent-State. *** CORAM :

6.cr.alp.282.2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ALP) NO.283 OF 2016

Priyesh Bheda

… Applicant

Versus

Vijaya Nadar and anr

… Respondents

***

None for Applicant.

Mr. Swapnil Pednekar, APP for Respondent-State.

***

CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.

DATE : 15 OCTOBER, 2026

P.C. :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. On 28.08.2026, following order was passed “ In the morning Session:

1. The Applicant is the complainant seeking leave to file an Appeal against the order of acquittal of the Respondent of an offence punishable under Section 500 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. On 02.09.2016, 19.01.2023, 17.11.2025, 08.12.2025 03.02.2026 and 14.08.2026, nobody appeared for the Applicant. In the circumstances, it appears that the Applicant is not serious about prosecuting the leave application.

3. The Application is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. In the afternoon Session:

4. The Applicant-party in person appeared and prayed for recalling of the above order. Considering the request made and the fact that above order has not been yet uploaded, the above order recalled.

5. Place the matter for further consideration on 04.09.2026.” Vina Khadpe

6. cr.alp.282.2016.doc

2. On 01.10.2026, again the Applicant did not appear and following order was passed “1. None for the Applicant.

2. Stand over to 15.10.2026. To be listed for ‘dismissal’.”

3. Today the matter is listed for dismissal. However, the Applicant is not present.

4. The Application is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, stands vacated. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Vina Khadpe

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead