Bombay High Court
ABA/2004/2026 of MOHIT MAHENDRA AGRAWAL Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 15 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2004 OF 2026 Mohit Mahendra Agrawal …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Vivekanand Vinod Krishnan (Through Video Conferencing), for the Applicant. Ms. S. M. Yadav,
622-ABA-2004-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2004 OF 2026
Mohit Mahendra Agrawal
…Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
…Respondent
Mr. Vivekanand Vinod Krishnan (Through Video Conferencing), for the Applicant.
Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED:
15 OCTOBER 2026
PC:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, Ms. Yadav, learned APP, for the Respondent- State, states that there are two criminal antecedents against the Applicant and they have not been disclosed in the Anticipatory Bail Application.
2. In view of the said contention raised by learned APP, Mr. Vivekanand Krishnan, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Anticipatory Bail Application by giving the details of all the antecedents.
3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with leave as aforesaid.
Arjun
622-ABA-2004-2026.DOC
4. It is clarified that the contentions of both the sides are expressly kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Arjun