Bombay High Court

WP/60/2026 of NANDA NANASAHEB GAIKWAD Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.60 OF 2026 Nanda Nanasaheb Gaikwad …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Surel Shah, Senior Counsel a /w Sandeep S. Salunkhe, for the Petitioner. Mr. Amit

1-WP (CRI.)-60-2026.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.60 OF 2026

Nanda Nanasaheb Gaikwad

…Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

…Respondent

Mr. Surel Shah, Senior Counsel a/w Sandeep S. Salunkhe, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Amit Munde, APP, for the Respondent-State.

API, Dhawale, Criminal Branch, Pune.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

15th OCTOBER 2026

PC:-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Shah, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Munde, learned APP for the Respondent-State.

2. By this Criminal Writ Petition, the challenge is to the order dated 10th July 2025 passed by learned Special Judge (MCOCA), Pune by which proclamation under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) has been issued against the Petitioner requiring to appear before the learned Special Judge (MCOCA), Pune on or before 30th August 2025.

3. However, Mr. Munde, learned APP, appearing for the Respondent-State, submits that this Court by order dated 12th

Akash

1-WP (CRI.)-60-2026.DOC September 2025 passed in Anticipatory Bail Application No.2496 of 2025 has rejected the Anticipatory Bail Application of the present Petitioner for the same crime and the said order has not been disclosed in this petition. Learned APP, more particularly points out that the Anticipatory Bail Application, inter alia is dismissed as the Applicant is absconding and that proclamation has been issued by the said order dated 10th July 2025. Apart from that various aspects have been taken into consideration including that provisions MCOCA Act have been invoked. Thus, order dated 12th September 2025 passed by this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.2496 of 2025 is very relevant and the same has not been disclosed in the petition.

4. Thus, it is very clear that the Petitioner has not approached this Court with clean hands.

5. In view of the above circumstances, no case is made out for interference under extraordinary and discretionary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and accordingly the Writ Petition is dismissed. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

Akash

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead