Bombay High Court

IA/5576/2026 of EMPIRE EXCELLENCE PROPERTIES PVT LTD Vs M/S. ACCUMEN INVESTMENT AND FINANCE PVT. LTD. on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN WP 5534-14-C.DOC Priya Soparkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5576 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5534 OF 2014 Empire Excellence Properties Private Limited …Applicant In the matter between Accumen Investment & Finance

21 IA 5576-26 IN WP 5534-14-C.DOC

Priya Soparkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5576 OF 2026

IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 5534 OF 2014

Empire Excellence Properties Private Limited …Applicant In the matter between Accumen Investment & Finance Private Limited … Petitioner

Versus

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and ors.

…Respondents

Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Pratap Patil, for the Petitioner/Applicant.

Mr. Prashant Chawan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anuj Jaiswal and Mr. Ravindra Chile i/by Little & Company, for the Respondents.

CORAM:

SUMAN SHYAM &

GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.

DATED:

14th OCTOBER, 2026.

PC:-

Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This Interim Application arises out of the Writ Petition No. 5534 of 2014. During the pendency of the Writ Petition, the Writ Petitioner has undergone a name change. Hence, the present

21 IA 5576-26 IN WP 5534-14-C.DOC Application for incorporating such change in the cause-title of the Writ Petition.

2. Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, learned senior counsel for Applicant submits that although the Writ Petition was originally instituted by M/s Accumen Investment & Finance Private Limited, the original Petitioner is now required to be substituted by M/s Empire Excellence Properties Private Limited i.e. the Applicant herein.

3. Prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel for the Respondents.

4. In view of the above, the prayer in the Application stands allowed.

5. The name be substituted by the Applicant. Necessary corrections in the cause-title be carried out.

6. Reverification stands dispensed with.

7. The Interim Application stands disposed of. (GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) {

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead