Bombay High Court
WP/4672/2025 of GUDDU @ FAIMUDDIN SALIMUDDIN SHAIKH Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 14 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4672 OF 2025 Guddu @ Faimuddin Salimuddin Shaikh .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ….... • Ms. Payoshi Roy a /w Ulkesh Gangurde i/b. Dashrath Gaikwad,
1 / 1
12-WP-4672-25.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4672 OF 2025
Guddu @ Faimuddin Salimuddin Shaikh
.... Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra
.... Respondent
…....
•
Ms. Payoshi Roy a/w Ulkesh Gangurde i/b. Dashrath Gaikwad, Advocate for Petitioner.
•
Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM
: SARANG V. KOTWAL &
RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
DATE
: 14th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that during pendency of the Petition, the authorities have taken a decision and have placed the Petitioner in category 4(b) of Annexure I to the 2010 Guidelines. She therefore seeks permission to withdraw this Petition with liberty to file fresh Petition challenging the decision placing the Petitioner in that category.
2. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with such liberty and is disposed of. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Nesarikar