Bombay High Court
APEAL/998/2025 of VINIT PRAMOD DHAGE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR on 14 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 998 OF 2025 Vinit Pramod Dhage …Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Rohan Hogle, Advocate for the Appellant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent/State. ACP. Ravindra
1-APEAL998-2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 998 OF 2025
Vinit Pramod Dhage
…Appellant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Rohan Hogle, Advocate for the Appellant.
Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent/State.
ACP. Ravindra Adane, Mahim Police Station, is present.
CORAM
:
N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE :
14.10.2026.
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file fresh application for anticipatory bail before the Trial Court/Special Court, as the prosecution has filed the charge-sheet against one of the co- accused.
2. The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
3. The interim order passed by this Court shall remain in force for a period of one week.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.] Pramod S.Lakare 1/1