Bombay High Court
WP/10294/2026 of AATMARAM DHANAJI THALI Vs THE CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND ORS on 14 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10294 OF 2026 Aatmaram Dhanaji Thali ....Petitioner V/S The City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd & Ors ....Respondents Mr. Rakesh Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. Priyansh Jain a /w. Mr. Akshay Naik
904.WP.10294.2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10294 OF 2026
Aatmaram Dhanaji Thali
....Petitioner
V/S
The City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd & Ors
....Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Patil for the Petitioner.
Mr. Priyansh Jain a/w. Mr. Akshay Naik i/b. Mr. Sagar Shetty for the Respondent-CIDCO.
Ms Neha Bhide, GP a/w. Mr. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 4
to 6-State.
CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. &
ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C.:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that since filing of the Writ Petition, no notices were served upon the Petitioner by the Respondent No. 3-The Assistant Controller, Unauthorized Construction, CIDCO.
2. Per contra, learned Counsel for the Respondent-CIDCO would submit that during the pendency of the proceedings the demolition has already been carried out and in case if the Petitioner is aggrieved, he may invoke the remedy as is available to him in accordance with law.
3. We are of the considered view that no such leave to institute a fresh Writ Petition be accorded, as the Petitioner has an efficacious remedy AKN
904. WP.10294.2026.doc available to espouse his case, in accordance with law.
4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner confronted with this situation, seek leave to withdraw the instant Writ Petition.
5. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn.
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] AKN