Bombay High Court
CARBP/1080/2026 of Ms PUNEET DEVELOPERS Vs NEHRU NAGAR MITRA SAHAKARI CHSL on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
10-CARBP-1080-2026 (OS) .DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1080 OF 2026
Ms Puneet Developers
...Petitioner
Versus
Nehru Nagar Mitra Sahakari CHSL
...Respondent
__
Mr. Indrakumar Lahoti i/b. Praxis Legal for the Petitioner Ms. Sunitha Perumal i/b. Sachin Masurkar for the Respondent __
CORAM
:
ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE
:
16th OCTOBER 2026
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the Petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and seeks an extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal to complete the arbitration proceedings and pass an arbitral award. This is a first extension.
2. I am informed that the arbitration proceedings are at the stage of cross-examination. Learned counsel for the Respondent confirms this position and does not oppose for extension.
3. In my view, the substantive interest of justice would best be served if the time is extended. Basavraj Page|1 10-CARBP-1080-2026 (OS) .DOC
4. Accordingly, the Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
5. It is made clear that the extended time shall commence from the date on which a copy of this order is uploaded. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Basavraj Page|2