Bombay High Court
CAO/1152/2026 of RAISAHEB REKHCHAND MOHOTA SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD. THR. DY. GENERAL MANAGER SHRI. P.W. HARNE Vs THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, HINGANGHAT, THR. CHIEF OFFICER AND ANOTHER on 15 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
1-WP-8192-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 8192/2017
RAISAHEB REKHCHAND MOHOTA SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD.
THR. DY. GENERAL MANAGER SHRI. P.W. HARNE
VS
THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, HINGANGHAT, THR. CHIEF OFFICER AND ANOTHER
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 172/2021
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 8192/2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Jatin Kumar, Advocate for the Applicant (s)/Petitioner (s).
Mr. Rozat Akolawala, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Ms. Bhawana Dwivedi h/f. Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Mr. Z.Z. Haq, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
Mr. C.J. Dhruv, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
Mr. I.A. Fidvi, Advocate for Respondent No. 7.
Mr. G.I. Dipwani, Advocate for Respondent No.8.
CORAM :
ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
DATE :
OCTOBER 15, 2026.
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 1152/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. The Applicant-Mr. Ashish Saoji is present in the Court.
3. The Applicant makes request to recall the order issuing bailable warrant, saying that he will diligently attend the Court proceedings.
4. On the basis of assurance so given, the order issuing bailable warrant against the applicant is recalled. Inform the concerned police station accordingly.
5. The application is disposed of in terms of above. Kartikeya
1-WP-8192-2017 CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2736/2025
6. Mr. Pradeep Harne, Respondent No. 7, and Mr. Likhit Masram, Respondent No. 8, are present in the Court. They make a request to recall the order issuing bailable warrant, saying that they will diligently attend the Court proceedings.
7. On the basis of assurance so given, the order issuing bailable warrant against Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 is recalled. Inform the concerned police station accordingly.
8. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 4, 7 and 8 seeks time to file reply. Granted.
9. In terms of order dated 07.10.2026, Mr. Rohan Deo, Amicus Curiae, submits that he intends to visit the plant on 18.10.2026 at 11:00 a.m.
10. The applicant shall make the necessary arrangements to facilitate the Amicus to visit the plant and other places as may be suggested by him.
11. Amicus seeks directions to the applicants to furnish the financial statement for two years from the date of acceptance of the Resolution Plan. The applicants shall furnish Financial Statement by 16.10.2026. The other documents, if sought by the Amicus, shall be supplied immediately to him by the concerned.
12. Stand over to 29.10.2026. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 172/2021
13. Stand over to 29.10.2026. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kartikeya