Bombay High Court

CAF/149/2021 of V. I. D. C. THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BEMBLA IRRIGATION DIVISION, YAVATMAL AND ANOTHER Vs RAJERAM BAPURAO KUMRE AND OTHERS on 15 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

910. caf.149.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAF] No.149 of 2021 in First Appeal Stamp No.16020 of 2019 Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation and another vs. Rajeram Bapurao Kumre and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. Vinay Dahat h/f Mr. J.B. Kasat, Advocate for the Applicants/Appellants. Mr. A.R. Patil, Advocate for Non-Applicant/Respondent No.1. Mr. G.S. Umale, A.G.P. for Non-Applicant/Respondent Nos.7 and 8.

CORAM

: Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : 15 th OCTOBER, 2

026. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants, the learned Counsel appearing for non-applicant No.1 and the learned A.G.P. appearing for non-applicant Nos.7 and 8.

02. Despite service, none appeared on behalf of non-applicant Nos.2, 3, 5 and 6. Vide order dated 10/12/2024, the application is abated against non-applicant No.4-Jawanti Bapurao Kumre.

03. By the present application, the applicants/acquiring body seek condonation of delay of 111 days caused in filing the appeal challenging the judgment and award dated 14/12/2018 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal, in L.A.C. No.279/2012.

04. The delay has not been seriously opposed on behalf of the non-applicants.

05. On perusal of the application, it appears that the applicants/ acquiring body have sufficiently explained the delay of 111 days caused in filing the appeal. 2026:BHC-NAG:13893

910. caf.149.21

06. Considering the grounds set out in the application, the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed of accordingly.

07. The Office to register the first appeal and place the matter before this Court on 29th October, 2026.

JUDGE *sandesh Signed by: Mr. Sandesh Waghmare Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 15/10/2026 18:47:08

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead