Bombay High Court

WP/6543/2017 of SMT. SADHANA W/O AVINASH DURATKAR @ KU. SADHANA SURESHCHANDRA BANNORE Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS on 14 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1 wp 6543.17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 6543 OF 2017 ( Smt. Sadhana w/o Avinash Duratkar @ Ku. Sadhana Sureshchandra Bannore ..vs.. State of Mahrashtra, through its Secretary, Department of School Education, Mumbai and others )

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. J.R. Kidilay, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A.V. Palshikar, AGP for respondent No.1, Mr. A.D. Mohgaonkar, Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3, Mr. D. Bhoyar, Counsel for respondent No.4. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATED : 14 th OCTOBER, 2026

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2. We have perused the record and gone through the reliefs sought in the present writ petition. Having regard to the nature of the reliefs sought in the present petition, we find that the grievance raised by the petitioner can appropriately be considered and decided by the Grievance Committee constituted pursuant to the Order dated 16-06-2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1775 of 2026. Since the reliefs sought by the petitioner squarely fall within the jurisdiction of the said Committee, we deem it appropriate to relegate the petitioner to avail the said remedy. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Grievance Committee, which shall consider and decide the petitioner’s grievance, as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law.

3. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All contentions of the parties are kept open. (Nivedita P. Mehta, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) adgokar 2026:BHC-NAG:13807-DB Signed by: MR. P.M. ADGOKAR Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 14/10/2026 17:25:45

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead