Bombay High Court
WP/7727/2026 of MR. DINESH S/O DARBARISINGH THAKUR Vs STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECY DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND ORS. on 14 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 WP7727-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.7727/2026 (DINESH DARBARSINGH THAKUR VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Shri Pratik Naidu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.A. Thakare, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE
, JJ.
D ATE
: OCTOBER 14
, 2026
. P. C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. On the complaint filed by the petitioner with the Chandrapur Municipal Corporation Grievance Citizen Portal dated 17.08.2026 which is at Record Page No.20, Annexure-P3, the respondent no.2 has issued a notice to the respondent no.4 on 20.08.2026. The aforesaid notice is at Record Page No.23, Annexure-P4. By virtue of the aforesaid notice, the respondent nos.2 and 3 had called upon the respondent no.4 to submit all the documents pertaining to his title so also the required sanctions and permits for the construction as mentioned in the complaint dated 17.08.2026.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is almost two months now that the respondent no.2 has done nothing in the matter and the respondent no.4 is continuing with the construction. In view of above, the petitioner has approached this Court.
4. Shri V.A. Thakare, learned Assistant Government Pleader appears for the respondent no.1. Since the nature of the order proposed to be passed is innocuous, we do not propose to issue notice to the respondent nos.2, 3 and 4. 2026:BHC-NAG:13861-DB
2 WP7727-26.odt
5. The respondent nos.2 and 3 are directed to adjudicate the notice dated 20.08.2026 and take it to its logical end. The respondent nos.2 and 3 are directed to decide the aforesaid notice within stipulated period of six weeks from today. The respondent nos.2 and 3 shall decide the aforesaid notice on its own merits and in accordance with law and after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the respondent no4. The decision taken thereupon shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of such decision.
6. The writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. No costs. (RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) APTE Signed by: Apte Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 15/10/2026 12:17:09