Bombay High Court
CAO/1035/2026 of SHAHEED ASHFAQ ULLAHKHAN MULTIPURPOSE EDUCATION SOCIETY THR. ITS PRESIDENT Vs SHAN BAHUUDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK VA KRIDA SANSTHA, DAHIHANDA, THR. ITS PRESIDENT on 14 October 2026
IN THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 130cao1035.2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 1035 OF 2026 (Shaheed Ashfaq Ullahkhan Multipurpose Education Society, Karanja Vs. Shan Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Va Sanstha, Dahihanda and ors) AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 323 OF 2026 (National Women’s Welfare Society and ors Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors) IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4415 2023(D) (Shan Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Va Krida Sanstha, Dahihanda and ors) __________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders __________________________________________________________________________________________ Mr. Amol Patil, Advocate for applicant in CAO 1035/2026. Mr. A.S. Dhore, Advocate for applicants in MCA 323 OF 2026 CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR & RAJNISH R. VYAS,JJ. DATE
: 14/10/2026
Heard learned counsel for the applicants.
2. For the reasons stated, the application for condonation of delay in filing review application is allowed. Application is disposed of. Civil Application (review) No. of 2026 Heard.
2. The learned counsel for applicant submits that he was not party to the original proceedings. Since, the order was obtained behind his back, review is being sought.
3. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 25.11.2026. Belkhede
2 130cao1035.2026.doc
4. The learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos. 2,3 and 4/state.
5. Mr. Dhore, learned counsel waives notice for respondent Nos. 6 to 9.
6. In addition to regular mode, the petitioner is permitted to serve the remaining respondents by private mode including RPAD.
7. In the interregnum, any decision taken would be subject to outcome of the present petition.
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 323 OF 2026 Heard.
2. The learned counsel Mr. Dhore, who is seeking review submits that the petitioner has relied upon the forged documents.
3. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 25.11.2026.
4. In addition to regular mode, the petitioner is permitted to serve the respondents by private mode including RPAD. (RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) Belkhede Signed by: Mr. R. S. Belkhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/10/2026 18:53:58