Bombay High Court

WP/8404/2026 of PRASHIK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT, SHRI. MOHAN S/O GOVINDRAO BHOYAR AND ORS. Vs REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, OTHER BACKWARD CLASSES WLFARE (REGIONAL) DEPT., AND ANR. on 14 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1 WP8404-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.8404/2026 (PRASHIK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, CHIKNI (DONGA) & OTHERS VERSUS REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, OBC WELFARE (REGIONAL) DEPARTMENT, AMRAVATI & ANOTHER) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Shri R.D. Karode, counsel for the petitioners. Shri S.V. Narale, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE

, JJ.

D ATE

: OCTOBER 14

, 2026

. P. C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking direction to the respondents to decide the proposal dated 28.08.2023 submitted by the petitioners for grant of approval to the appointment of the petitioner no.3 in the petitioner no.2-Ashram School. The aforesaid proposal is at Record Page No.10, Annexure-A.

3. Shri R.D. Karode, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the aforesaid proposal should have been submitted to the respondent no.1-Regional Deputy Director, Other Backward Classes Welfare (Regional) Department, Amravati, however, inadvertently it came to be submitted to the Office of the respondent no.2-Assistant Director, Yavatmal.

4. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners shall submit the aforesaid proposal after complying with the necessary requisites to the Office of the respondent no.1-Regional Deputy Director, Other Backward Classes Welfare (Regional) Department, Amravati within one weeks from today. 2026:BHC-NAG:13862-DB

2 WP8404-26.odt

5. Once the proposal is submitted, the respondent no.1-Regional Deputy Director, Other Backward Classes Welfare (Regional) Department, Amravati is directed to decide the same within the stipulated period of four weeks from the date of submission of such proposal. Needless to mention that the respondent no.1-Regional Deputy Director, Other Backward Classes Welfare (Regional) Department, Amravati shall decide the same on its own merits and in accordance with law. The decision taken thereupon shall be communicated to the petitioners within two weeks from such decision.

6. The writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. No costs. (RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) APTE Signed by: Apte Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 15/10/2026 12:18:19

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead