Bombay High Court
WP/3749/2025 of VANDANA WD/O KRUSHNA RAUT AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ANR. on 13 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 wp 3749.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3749 OF 2025 ( Smt. Vandana wd/o Krushna Raut and another ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary for Rural Development Department, Mumbai and another )
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.S. Taram, Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. S.B. Bissa, A.G.P. for respondent No.1, Ms. Meghna Munshi, Counsel for respondent No.2. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATED : 13 th OCTOBER, 2026
On 07-09-2026, following order was passed: “After hearing for some time, learned counsel for respondent No.2, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the pleadings made in reply dated 14.08.2026. The request to withdraw is made because we pointed out to the learned counsel that the pleadings run contrary to the Full Bench judgment in Kalpana wd/o Vilas Taram and anr. .Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors; [2024 (4) Mh.L.J. 312]
2. Permission is granted with a hope that the learned counsel and respondent No.2 both will be careful in incorporating such pleadings in the affidavit. We also expect respondent No.2 to take corrective steps in terms of the aforesaid judgment before next date.
3. Stand over to 16.09.2026.”
2. In compliance, respondent No.2 has taken corrective steps by including the name of the petitioner No. 2 in the waitlist.
3. In the wake of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of. (Nivedita P. Mehta, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) adgokar Signed by: MR. P.M. ADGOKAR Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 13/10/2026 14:50:56