Bombay High Court
CAO/1097/2026 of JAYWANT CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., THR. ITS SECRETARY MANGESH S/O NIRANJAN TARALE AND OTHER Vs SHRAWASTI CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., THR. PRESIDENT MANDAKINI JAMKAR AND OTHERS on 13 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
1 / 2 5-cao-1097-26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1097 OF 2026
IN
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 19545 OF 2026
AND
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 19545 OF 2026
IN
SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.2456 OF 2025(d)
Jaywant Co-operative Housing Society Ltd .and ors.
Vs.
Shrawasti Co-operative Housing Society, through President
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Uday Gosavi, counsel for the Applicants.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 13/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. The applicants have filed these applications for condonation of 55 days delay in filing the application for restoration of the Second Appeal and for restoration of the Second Appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the appeal was pending under a stamp number. Although an application for condonation of delay had been filed, the same was not accepted by the Registry, and office objections were raised. Learned counsel was unaware of the said Kavita 2 / 2 5-cao-1097-26 objections. When he subsequently attempted to circulate the matter, he came to know that the appeal had been dismissed at the stage of filing.
4. As the office objections were not removed within the stipulated time, a conditional order came to be passed by the Registrar, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and causing the delay.
5. Considering the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed. The delay of 55 days is hereby condoned. The Registry is directed to restore the Second Appeal to its original stage.
7. The applications stand disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE Kavita Signed by: Kavita P Tayade Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/10/2026 11:21:11