Bombay High Court
WP/930/2024 of NAMDEV MAHADEVRAO NANDANE Vs V G Malpe on 12 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH
209.wp.930.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.930 OF 2024
Namdev Mahadevrao Nandane .Vs. V.G. Malpe Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. R.A. Bagde, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr.S.G. Malode, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J.
DATE : 12/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Bagde, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Malode, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Both the learned counsel submit that the parties have resolved the dispute amicably out of the Court and have entered the common terms of settlement which are agreed between the petitioner and the respondent. As per the common terms of agreement dated 12.10.2026, the petitioner and the respondent had agreed to resolve the dispute. The respondent has handed over a Demand Draft of Rs.2,00,000/- in the name of present petitioner, Mr. Namdev Nandane. The petitioner, Mr. Namdev Nandane is present before this Court acknowledges the receipt of the Demand Draft of Rs.2,00,000/-. The respondent, Mr. V.G. Malpe, who is personally present before this Court has submitted that the dispute has arisen due to some misunderstanding, however, now the petitioner and the respondent have amicably resolved the dispute. 2026:BHC-NAG:13638
209. wp.930.2024.odt
3. The respondent, Mr. V.G. Malpe, further tendered an unconditional apology to the petitioner, Mr. Namdev Nandane, for any misunderstanding, however, due to the intervention of near relatives and well wishers from the same town, the matter has been amicably resolved between the petitioner and the respondent. After receipt of an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the respondent, the petitioner has agreed to withdraw the complaint filed before the Bar Council as well as to delete the name of the respondent, Mr. V.G. Malpe, from all proceedings pending till date. The common terms of settlement agreed between the petitioner and the respondent signed by the respective counsels is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
4. In pursuance to the aforesaid common terms of settlement, the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the present writ petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Parties to act in accordance with the common terms of settlement arrived at.
(MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J.) C.L. Dhakate Signed by: Mr. C.L. Dhakate Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 12/10/2026 18:17:39