Bombay High Court

/7955/2025 of BHANDARA ZILLA DUGDHA UTPAKAK SAHAKARI SANGH MYDT. THR. MANAGING DIRECTOR, BHANDARA Vs SHANKAR S/O. SITKUJI UPASE on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

(1) 31 wp 243-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 243 OF 2025 Shankar Sitkuraji Upase VERSUS The Bhandara Zilla Dudh Utpadak Sahakari Maryadit, Bhandara Thr. Charge Managing Director WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7955 OF 2025 Bhandara Zilla Dugdha Utpakak Sahakari Sangh Mydt. Thr. Managing Director, Bhandara VERSUS Shankar S/o. Sitkuji Upase -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N.B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for petitioner in WP 243/2025. Mr. K.A. Patil, Advocate for petitioner in WP 7955/2025 & respondent in WP 243/2025.

CORAM :

NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 12.10.2026

Heard Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner. He makes a submission, on instructions, that the petitioner, i.e. the employer, is ready to comply the order which is impugned in the present petition. The order impugned is dated 27.07.2022, passed below Exhibit 106, by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Fast Track Court, Bhandara. By way of said order, the Trial Court directed the employer to disclose its assets on oath and to give an undertaking that it will not dispose of the said assets till

(2) 31 wp 243-2025 decision of the said suit. It is this order which Mr. Patil has instructions that the petitioner will comply with.

2. In that view of the matter, the cause of action no more survives, the petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Mr. Kalwaghe, learned Counsel would submit that since the respondent in the present matter and who is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 7955 of 2025 has made a statement that he would comply the order impugned in the petition, he would not like to press this petition, the present disposed of as withdrawn.

2. Mr. Kalwaghe, learned Counsel would make a reasonable request that R.C.S. No. 194 of 2017, is pending since long and the petitioner was terminated in the year 2007. In that view of the matter, the Trial Court, i.e. the Civil Judge Senior Division, Fast Track Court, Bhandara, is directed to decide the R.C.S. No. 194 of 2017, as expeditiously as possible and within a period of six weeks from the date of this order. (NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J.) Jayashree.. Signed by: Mrs. Jayashree Pethe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 16/10/2026 18:05:42

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead