Bombay High Court

WP/8341/2026 of PODAR LITERACY AND AND EDUCATION TRUST, THR. AUTH. REPRESENTATIVE UMESHKUMAR GUNDA KOTIAN AND ANR. Vs THE STATE OF MAH., THR. PRINCIPAL SEC. SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT. AND ORS. on 12 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

152. wp.8341.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 8341 OF 2026 Podar Literacy and Education Trust and another .Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.

Mr R. D. Dhande, Advocate for the petitioner/s Mr P. P. Pendke, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4/State CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATED : 12

th OCTOBER

, 2026

.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. This writ petition has been filed with the assertion that the petitioners – Institutions are entitled to reimbursement of fees for students admitted within the quota of 25% as per the provisions of Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act, 2009. However, as per their entitlements, the petitioners- Institutions have not been reimbursed the said.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners points out that, a similar issue has been decided by this Court in Writ Petition No.2819/2021 on 16/10/2023, so also in Writ Petition No.5825/2024 with connected Writ Petition Nos.5826/2024 and 5827/2024 on 09/10/2024. He, therefore, requests this Court to extend the similar benefit to the petitioners. 2026:BHC-NAG:13670-DB

152. wp.8341.2026.odt

4. Accordingly, we direct that each case of the petitioners shall be scrutinized by the authority concerned within a period of four weeks and the eligibility and quantum be determined by the concerned respondent, to which the petitioners are entitled to.

5. If the petitioners are found to be entitled to some amount, the same shall be reimbursed to them. However, in case, the petitioners are not found to be entitled, then they shall be communicated the reasons for their non-entitlement for the amount they are claiming.

6. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. No costs. [RAJNISH R. VYAS, J] [ANIL S. KILOR, J.] Namrata Signed by: Miss Namrata Suryawanshi Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 12/10/2026 20:00:06

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead