Bombay High Court
CAW/2408/2026 of M/S METALWELL TRADING COMPANY LIMITED, THR. POA HOLDER NAMELY NARESH KUMAR GUPTA Vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NAGPUR, CUSTOMS COMMISSIONERATE, NAGPUR AND ANR. on 9 October 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
caw 2408.2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Civil Application (CAW) No. 2408 of 2026 in Writ Petition No. 5299 of 2025 [M/s Metalwell Trading Co. Ltd. Thr. POA Holder namely Naresh Kumar Gupta vs. Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur and anr.] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Hitesh Khandwani, Advocate for the applicant/original respondent no. 2 Mr. Bharat Raichandani, Advocate for petitioner through V.C. Mr. S. S. Malode, Advocate for petitioner Mrs. Kekti Vaidya-Jaltare, Advocate for respondent no. 1 CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : 09-10-2026. On 22-09-2026, following order was passed. “The application is filed for correction of order dated 11/9/2026. The contents of the application, however, indicate that a typographical error has occurred while typing the order, when, in fact, the order was typed based on the information supplied by the Counsel appearing for respondent no.1.
In the circumstances, let respondent no.1 file reply so as to make necessary corrections in the order under question.
List on 9/10/2026.” As could be seen, the application for correction of order has been filed by respondent no. 2. The error, which is sought to be corrected, occurred on account of information supplied by counsel appearing
Order
caw 2408.2026.odt for respondent no. 1. In response to above order, respondent no. 1 has filed reply. The mistake is that the registration number of civil appeal and the name of parties in the judgment of the Supreme Court referred to in order dated 11-09-2026 were wrongly submitted by respondent no. 1. The correct number of the civil appeal and name of parties be accordingly incorporated in terms of the reply filed by respondent no. 1. Necessary corrections in the order dated 11-9-2026 be made accordingly and corrected order be uploaded. The application is disposed of. Writ Petition No. 5299 of 2025 List after two weeks. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) wasnik Signed by: Mr. A. Y. Wasnik Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 09/10/2026 18:26:48