Bombay High Court
CAM/305/2026 of NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL Vs ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS on 9 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 / 6 903.cam304.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 304 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 170 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 300 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 171 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 299 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 297 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 173 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 296 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 174 OF 2025 Prity
2 / 6 903.cam304.2026 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 309 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 178 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 307 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 179 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 305 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 180 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 303 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 181 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 308 OF 2026 IN Prity
3 / 6 903.cam304.2026 ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 182 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 293 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 183 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 294 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 184 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 306 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 185 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 302 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 186 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 301 OF 2026 Prity
4 / 6 903.cam304.2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 187 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 298 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 188 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 314 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 189 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 311 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 190 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 310 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 191 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND Prity
5 / 6 903.cam304.2026 CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 312 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 192 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 313 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 193 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAM) NO. 295 OF 2026 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 07 OF 2026 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THR PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, YAVATMAL VS ARCHANA SANJEEV JOSHI AND OTHERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.A. Kathane, Advocate for applicant. Mrs. M.A. Barabde, AGP for respondent/State. Mr. H.D. Dangre, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM : NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 09.10.2026
This is an application on behalf of respondent No.1 seeking permission to withdraw the compensation amount. Prity
6 / 6 903.cam304.2026
2. Mr. Kathane, learned counsel appearing for the original appellant, i.e. National Highway Authority of India, submits that the matters have been settled in the Lok Adalat and therefore, there is no objection to allow such applications.
3. In that view of the matter, the applications are allowed in terms of respective prayer clauses.
4. All civil applications are allowed and disposed of accordingly.
5. In view of the fact that the matters stand settled, as agreed by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the arbitration appeals are also disposed of in terms of said compromise. [ NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J. ] Prity Signed by: Mrs. Prity Gabhane Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 13/10/2026 10:31:41