Bombay High Court
WP/7135/2026 of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA Vs JOHRABI SHABBIR HUSSAIN on 9 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
1/2 33-WP-7127-26+7.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.7127 OF 2026
CHIEF EXEUCUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA VS ABDUL KAYYUM MOHAMAD
ISMAIL
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7128 OF 2026
CHIEF EXEUCUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA VS HARIS HAMID GULAM ABBAS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7129 OF 2026
CHIEF EXEUCUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA VS MOHSIN SAHEB ABDUL KARIM
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7130 OF 2026
CHIEF EXEUCUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA VS NUR MOHAMMAD JAHIRUL
HUSAIN
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7131 OF 2026
CHIEF EXEUCUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA VS ABDUL MUNAF ABDUL LATIF
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7132 OF 2026
CHIEF EXEUCUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA VS ASHOK VITTHAL OYIMBE
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7133 OF 2026
CHIEF EXEUCUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA VS FIROJA BANO SHEIKH CHAND
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7135 OF 2026
CHIEF EXEUCUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA VS JOHRABI SHABBIR HUSSAIN
- -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Abhishek Rao, Advocate h/f Shri B. N. Jaipurkar, Advocate for petitioner/ZP.
CORAM : RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.
DATED : October 09, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Counsel for the petitioner-Zilla Parishad, Akola submits that though alternate remedy is available, same cannot be availed for the reason that delay of at the most 120 days can be condoned by the appellate Authority. He submits that inadvertently, the pleadings in the present petitions regarding explanation of delay are missing. He therefore seeks permission to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file afresh incorporating all the relevant pleadings supported by documentary evidence in order to put forth the petitioner’s claim. 2026:BHC-NAG:13625
2/2 33-WP-7127-26+7.odt
2. In view of aforesaid, writ petitions are permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with appropriate pleadings and documents.
3. Writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.
(Rajnish R. Vyas, J.) Asmita Signed by: Smt. Asmita A. Bhandakkar Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/10/2026 17:29:36