Bombay High Court

ABA/851/2026 of VIKAS S/O DEVANAND KHOBRAGADE Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS TUMSAR DIST. BHANDARA on 8 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION [A.B.A.] NO. 851 OF 2026

Vikas S/o Devanand Khobragade

-- VERSUS --

State of Maharashtra

__________________________________________________________________________

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr. A.K. Madane, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. H.D. Marathe, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State.

CORAM :

M.M. NERLIKAR, J.

DATE :

OCTOBER 08, 2026.

Heard.

2.

Apprehending arrest, the accused has approached this Court in connection with Crime No.832/2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 3(5), 329(3), 333, 351(2)

and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 4, 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered with Police Station Tumsar, District Bhandara.

3.

As per the First Information Report (F.I.R.), the informant alleged that, on 16/07/2026 at about 12.30 PM while he was present at his father’s godown, the accused, Rakesh Wasnik, along with 2 to 3 unknown persons entered the premises and allegedly threatened him with a knife, assaulted

2026:BHC-NAG:13482

him and warned him to close his shop permanently. Based on these allegations, the First Information Report (F.I.R.) came to be registered.

4.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that, in the entire F.I.R., no overt act has been attributed to the applicant. However, the only allegations against the applicant are that he hurled abuses and given kicks and fist blows. Apart from that, there are no serious allegations against the applicant.

5.

To this, the learned A.P.P. concedes this fact, however, he submits that, considering the nature of the allegations against the accused persons, the applicant does not deserve to be granted bail.

6.

I have heard both sides. By order dated 24/09/2026, this Court has granted interim protection to the applicant.

Considering the submissions of both sides, I am inclined to accept the submissions of the applicant. Hence, the following order:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

(i) The Criminal Application is allowed and disposed of;

(ii) The order dated 24/09/2026 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions as incorporated in the said order;

(iii) Pending Misc. Application(s), if any, also stand disposed of;

(iv) The observations of this Court are prima facie in nature and are only limited to this application. The trial Court shall not be influenced by the aforesaid observations.

[ (M.M. NERLIKAR, J.)

Piyush Mahajan Signed by: Piyush Ramesh Mahajan Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/10/2026 18:38:17

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead