Bombay High Court
CAO/1057/2026 of SHRI. KISNA GANPAT TADAS Vs PANDURANG G. TADAS (DEAD) THR LRS SANJAY PANDURANG TADAS AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
06. cao.1057.26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1057 OF 2026 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.17402 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.101 OF 2011 (SHRI. KISNA GANPAT TADAS VS PANDURANG GANPATRAO TADAS (DEAD) THR LRS & ORS.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R.R. Maddalwar, Advocate for the applicant.
CORAM:-
MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
, J.
DATED :-
OCTOBER 08, 2026
The applicant has filed this application for condonation of delay in filing review application. There is a delay of 3229 days.
2. The applicant has filed the review application on the ground that the decree was passed against a deceased person. Respondent No.5 was deceased when the judgment was passed, and the share was allocated to her which was, as per the Will, given to the grandchildren. Though the applicant was a party to the appeal and he was respondent No.4 in the second appeal, respondent No.5 is the mother of the respondent No.4. He was aware about the judgement passed by this Court and the death of his mother, yet he has not taken any steps. He did not even inform the Court or the appellant about the death of his mother. The portion which *Divya 2026:BHC-NAG:13477
06. cao.1057.26.odt was allocated to respondent No.5 is distributed as per the Will.
3. In view of the reasons given by the applicant for the inordinate delay of 3229 days, no case is made out to condone the delay.
4. Hence, the application is rejected.
( MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
, J. ) *Divya Signed by: Mrs. Divya Baldwa Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/10/2026 18:15:01