Bombay High Court
CAW/2499/2026 of PURUSHOTTAM S/O PAIKUJI SANDHEKAR Vs VICE-CHAIRMAN/MEMBER SECRETARY, SCHEDULED TRIBE CASTE CERTI. SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, AMRAVAT AND OTHERS on 7 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
(1) 4.wp.2129.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2499 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2129 OF 2021
Purushottam s/o Paikuji Sandhekar
Vs.
The Vice-Chairman/Member Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati and others
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Preeti D. Rane, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms. S. S. Jachak, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 3 / State.
Mr. C. J. Dhumane, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND
RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
DATED : 07/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The application is for amendment.
2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this court vide order dated 28.05.2021, issued notices in the writ petition and granted interim relief in favour of the applicant with regard to his employment and thereby staying the impugned order passed by the Scrutiny Committee. The writ petition is pending and the said interim order continues to operate and subsist.
3. She further stated that during the pendency of the aforesaid writ petition, subsequent developments in respect of the services of the petitioner had taken place. The petitioner wants to bring the said development on record and, therefore, filing the present application for amendment. 2026:BHC-NAG:13503-DB
(2) 4.wp.2129.2021
4. Learned AGP as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2, has no objection as far as the amendment part is concerned.
5. We have verified from the order sheet it reveals that by order dated 28.05.2021, the interim relief was granted till next date. It was not continued thereafter from 28.05.2021 till today. There was no request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner to continue the said relief. Now, the petitioner is already terminated from service for want of validity certificate, therefore, we are not inclined to consider the interim relief, however, we allow the amendment application.
6. The amendment be carried out within two working days.
7. Amended copy be placed on record and shall be furnished to the respondents.
8. Stand over to 22.10.2026.
(RAJ D. WAKODE, J) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J) Sarkate Signed by: Mr. A.R. Sarkate Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/10/2026 19:34:01