Bombay High Court
APPW/194/2026 of DIPESH DILIP KANABAR Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY, DEPT OF HOME, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND OTHERS on 6 October 2026
cri appln. 194.26.odt..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
23 misc. cri appln. 194.26.odt..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPW) NO.194 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.14 OF 2025 (D) Dipesh S/o Dilip Kanabar .Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. I.S. Charlewar, Advocate for the petitioner/applicant. Mr A.A. Madiwale, APP for the respondents/State. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI PHALKE AND
RAJ D. WAKODE, J.J. DATED : 06.10.2026.
This is an application for restoration of criminal writ petition.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner who submitted that due to non-removal of the office objections within one week in view of the order dated 08.09.2025 writ petition came to be dismissed. She submitted that the objection was in respect of faint pages and the large number of pages were required to be replaced and the petitioner assigned the said work to one of his colleague. However, inadvertently the objections could not be removed. She submitted that the act of the petitioner was not intentional one, if the matter is not restored the petitioner would sustain irreparable loss.
23 misc. cri appln. 194.26.odt..odt
3. Learned APP for the State strongly opposed for the same on the ground that despite opportunity was granted, the objections are not removed.
4. Considering the reason mentioned in the application which satisfactorily explained by the petitioner and hence the application deserves to be allowed.
5. The application is allowed and disposed of.
6. The order of dismissal of writ petition is hereby set aside and petition is restored at its original stage. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.14 OF 2025
7. The petitioner shall remove office objections within a period of one week.
8. On non-removal of the office objections petition deserves to be dismissed without any further relief.
9. The copy of the writ petition be supplied to the respondents. [RAJ D. WAKODE, J] [URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J.] manisha Signed by: Mrs. Manisha Shewale Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/10/2026 11:09:07