Gujarat High Court
SCA/6225/1991 of NARENDRA R PURANI Vs DABHOI NAGAR PALIKA on 8 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6225 of 1991 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6496 OF 1991 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5379 OF 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR and MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6225 of 1991
with
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6496 OF 1991
WITH
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5379 OF 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR and MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- NARENDRA R PURANI
Versus
DABHOI NAGAR PALIKA
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR TR MISHRA for Petitioner
MR MI PATEL for Respondent No. 1
MR SV PARMAR for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR and MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH
Date of decision: 08/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
All these petitions have already been admitted. Rule is issued and they await final hearing.
Mr. Mishra for the petitioners states that in all these matters, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and it has been reduced into writing. It is signed by the petitioners as well as the respondents as also by learned counsel for both the sides. Terms of settlement have been made order of Court . Petitions are accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged in terms of settlement which have been made order of Court. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. Parties will act as per this order.
--
parekh