Gujarat High Court
CRA/959/1997 of PRAHLADBHAI AMTHARAM JOSHI Vs DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER on 16 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 959 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 959 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- PRAHLADBHAI AMTHARAM JOSHIVersus DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PJ PATEL for Petitioner MS MAMTA VYAS for Respondent No. 1, 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 16/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
#. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
#. On 17th July, 1997, this court passed the order:
Rule. To be heard with Civil Revision Application No.813 of 1996.
Direct service is permitted
#. This interim relief granted by this court continues. Looking to the fact that because of the pendency of the suit out of which this civil revision application arises the widow and other heirs are not getting the pension and other retirementary benefits of the deceased petitioner, interest of justice will be served in case this revision application is disposed of in the terms that interim relief granted by this court shall continue till decision of the suit and the learned trial court shall decide the suit finally within a period of six months from the date of receipt of writ of this order.
#. Rule and civil revision application stand disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
.......
[sunil]