Gujarat High Court

SCA/8178/1996 of NAINABEN BALLUBHAI GANDHI Vs GEB on 8 November 1996

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8178 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8178 of 1996

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- NAINABEN BALLUBHAI GANDHIVersus GEB -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PB MAJMUDAR for Petitioner MR TUSHAR MEHTA for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH Date of decision: 08/11/96

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Rule. Service of rule waived by Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Mr. P.B. Majmudar, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition and seeks indulgence of this Court in paying the amount of the supplementary bill by this Court. By the concensus of the parties, it is directed as under :-

(i) The petitioner will pay an amount of Rs.12,000/- to the respondent-Board alongwith reconnection charges on or before 25/11/1996. On such payment being made, the Board will reconnect the electricity supply of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall pay the balance amount in ten equal monthly instalments with late payment charges without fail.

(iii) In the event of any single instalment not being paid by the petitioner, as aforesaid, it will be open for the Board to disconnect the electricity supply forthwith and will also be entitled to call upon the petitioner to pay the entire unpaid amount.

(iv) The petitioner will file an undertaking before this Court to the effect that the petitioner will abide by the above mode of payment within a period of 7 days from today.

Subject to aforesaid direction, rule is

discharged. No order as to cost. D.S.P.

* * *

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead