Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/2235/2026 of SK SAMSUDDIN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 15 October 2026

15.10.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.33 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2235 of 2026 Sk. Samsuddin Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of

D/L 17

15.10.2026

Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)

ct.no.33

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

C.R.M (M) 2235 of 2026

Sk. Samsuddin

Vs

The State of West Bengal

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of Domjur Police Station Case No. 628 of 2018 dated 29.08.2018 under Sections 302/201/34

of the IPC.

And

In the matter of : Sk. Samsuddin

…Petitioner.

Mr. Sk. Toslim Ali

…for the Petitioner

(Name Not Supplied)

…for the State

1. The Learned Advocate representing the petitioner submitted the petitioner to be in custody for more than 8 years, on the basis of suspicion as the body of the victim was recovered from a septic tank with no involvement of the petitioner being innocent. Eight witnesses out of thirty witnesses had been examined by the prosecution and with no further immediate conclusion of recording of evidence the petitioner may be released on bail.

2. The Learned Advocate representing the State submitted the petitioner to have been the principal accused in murdering a bank official heinously.

3. Considering the narrative in the complaint, seizure list, the post mortem report, the statements recorded under

Page 1 of 2

Section 161 and Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure wherefrom it revealed the present petitioner to have atrociously severed the head and limbs of the deceased victim and thereafter based on his leading statements, the body parts to have been recovered, this Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The prayer for bail in the instant case is rejected at this stage.

5. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead