Calcutta High Court

MAT/1868/2026 of THE INSPECTOR OF CHARGE OF BONGAON POLICE STATION Vs COMMUNIST PARTY FO INDIA (MARXIST) AND OTHERS on 15 October 2026

Ct. No.1 KS IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE M.A.T. 1868 of 2026 + I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2026 The Inspector In Charge of Bongaon Police Station Versus Communist Party of India (Marxist) & Ors. Appearance: Mr. Surojit Nath Mitra, Ld. A.G. Mr. Billwadal

WBCHCA0565062026

Item No.9

Ct. No.1

KS

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

M.A.T. 1868 of 2026

+

I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2026

The Inspector In Charge of Bongaon Police Station

Versus

Communist Party of India (Marxist) & Ors.

Appearance:

Mr. Surojit Nath Mitra, Ld. A.G.

Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. A.A.G.

Mr. Anindya Basu, Ld. Sr. G.A.

Mr. Pratip Mukherjee

Mr. Bikash Kumar Sriwastav

…..Advocates for Appellant

Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Shamim Ahammed

Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay

Mr. Siddhartha Sankar Mondal

Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta

Ms. Ambiya Khatun

Mr. Sayan Banerjee

Mr. Ajoy Barman Roy

Mr. Asif Ikbal Baidya

Ms. Reshma Khatun

Md. Nasirul Haque

Ms. Shreya Das

Ms. Zoya Eram

Ms. Sabnam Mostari

.....Advocates for Pvt. Respondent/Original Petitioner CORAM: RAVINDRA VITHALRAO GHUGE, CHIEF JUSTICE

&

OM NARAYAN RAI, J.

Date: 15.10.2026

Page 1 of 2

Order

(Per Court)

1. This matter was heard briefly.

2. Considering the submissions of the learned Advocate General along with Additional Advocate General for the Appellant, as well as, for the Proforma Respondents and Shri Bhattacharya, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the Original Petitioner before the learned Single Judge and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Asma Lateef & Anr. vs. Shabbir Ahmad, (2024) 4 SCC 696 and Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Limited vs. Grse Limited Workmens Union, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 582, we are of the view that the learned Single Judge can deal with the issue as to whether the Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner, it is within its Roster Assignment/Determination.

3. Both the sides agree to address the Learned Single Judge on this aspect.

4. We appreciate the fairness shown by the learned senior advocates for both the sides before us.

5. Let these parties address the learned Single Judge on the said aspect. We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion on the said issue.

6. In view of the above, the Appeal, as well as, the Civil Application (I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2026) stand disposed off.

(OM NARAYAN RAI, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE) Chief Justice

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead