Calcutta High Court

WPA/9518/2026 of SHADAB HASSAN AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 15 October 2026

sg WPA 9518 of 2026 Shadab Hassan and Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Barun Ghosh Mr. B.K. Singh Mr. Jayanta Mitra …for the petitioner. Ms. Joyita Ray Ms. Sulogna Chowdhury …for the State. 1. Affidavit of service file by the petitioner be kept with the record.

15.10.2026

Sl.68

Ct.No.-34

sg

WPA 9518 of 2026

Shadab Hassan and Anr.

Vs.

State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Barun Ghosh

Mr. B.K. Singh

Mr. Jayanta Mitra

…for the petitioner.

Ms. Joyita Ray

Ms. Sulogna Chowdhury

…for the State.

1. Affidavit of service file by the petitioner be kept with the record.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondent no.2 to reach at a logical conclusion to investigate the case on the basis of the complaint lodged before the respondent no.2 on 8th March, 2026.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that they have purchased the impugned flat from Md. Mustaque towards sale agreement dated 31st October, 2025 in respect of the flat and on 9.11.2025 at about 3 P.M. when the petitioner no.1 went to the said flat for the purpose of shifting he was dragged by the private respondents who used abusive language towards the petitioner no.1 and also restrained them from entering the said flat.

4. Over the incident he lodged a complaint before respondent no.2 on 14.11.2025. However no action has been taken on behalf of the respondent no.2 with regard to the said complaint. Subsequently

2 another complaint was lodged on 8th March, 2026 and despite that no steps has been taken as of now.

5. Having no other option petitioner has to come before this Court for such direction on behalf of the State respondent.

6. It is submitted on behalf of State that they have received copy of the writ petition and assured that State will take necessary steps in accordance with the law.

7. None appears to represent private respondents despite service has been effected upon the private respondents.

8. Having heard the learned advocates and going through the materials on record and the nature of allegation leveled therein, it is evident that a complaint regarding alleged incident was lodged before the respondent no.2 and respondent no.2 is under obligation to take appropriate steps in accordance with law with regard to the said complaint.

9. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of without calling for Affidavit with such direction to the respondent no.2 to do the needful at an earliest.

10. All parties shall act in terms of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

[Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.]

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead