Calcutta High Court

WPA/25022/2026 of AYESHA SULTANA AND ANR. Vs ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. no. 21 SL.61 (SG) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/25022/2026 AYESHA SULTANA & ANR. VS ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS Mr. Supratick Syanal, Ms. Arkarupa Roy .. for the Petitioners. Ms. Anamika Pandey, .. for ECI Mr. Rahul Agarwala,

14.10.2026

Ct. no. 21

SL.61

(SG)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

WPA/25022/2026

AYESHA SULTANA & ANR.

VS

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

Mr. Supratick Syanal,

Ms. Arkarupa Roy

.. for the Petitioners.

Ms. Anamika Pandey,

.. for ECI

Mr. Rahul Agarwala,

….for the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. A challan showing deficit Court fees filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

2. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

3. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition seeking direction upon the SIR Tribunal to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner.

4. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having EPIC No. IIJ0953364 & IIJ272426 preferred an appeal against deletion of her name in the SIR process before the designated Appellate Tribunal.

5. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that she is seeking early disposal of the proceeding pending before the Tribunal.

6. Considered the submission of the learned advocate in view of the above the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal.

2

7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the case.

8. Accordingly, WPA 25022 of 2026 is disposed of.

9. There shall be no order as to cost.

10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities.

(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead