Calcutta High Court

WPA/22986/2026 of SAPTARSHI BISHNU Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 October 2026

AD/03/18 266312 NANDY (DNP) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/22986/2026 DR. SAPTARSHI BISHNU VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Sankha Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy, Advocate Mr. Gourav Haldar, Advocate Mr. Biswarup Nandy,

AD/03/18

266312

NANDY

(DNP)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

WPA/22986/2026

DR. SAPTARSHI BISHNU

VS

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Mr. Sankha Ghosh, Advocate

Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy, Advocate

Mr. Gourav Haldar, Advocate

Mr. Biswarup Nandy, Advocate

……for the Petitioner

1. As submitted by Mr. Roy, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, the instant writ- petition has become infructuous in view of the acceptance of the resignation of the petitioner during the pendency of the writ-petition.

2. A copy of the letter of acceptance as well as the written instruction is kept with the record.

3. In view thereof, WPA/22986/2026 is dismissed as not pressed.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

P a g e | 2

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead