Calcutta High Court

CRM(R)/111/2026 of AKLI BEGUM @ AKILMA BEGUM Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 October 2026

Court No.35. D/L. 4 Kausik (Allowed) CRM (R) 111 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Bagdah Police Station Case No. 934 of 2025 dated 15.11.2025 under

14.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 4 Kausik (Allowed)

CRM (R) 111 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Bagdah Police Station Case No. 934 of 2025 dated 15.11.2025 under Sections 21/24 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025.

And In the matter of : Akli Begum @ Akilma Begum

……Petitioner.

Mr. Sabir Ahmed

Mr. Dhiman Banerjee

……for the Petitioner.

Dr. Pradip Banerjee, Ld. APP

Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh

….for the State.

Page 1 of 2

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits petitioner is in custody for about 11 months. Charge sheet was submitted but there has been no progress in the case after filing of the charge sheet.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Having considered the prescribed punishment and the period for which the petitioner is in custody, I am of the opinion that some time will be required to take the trial to its logical conclusion.

2

Accordingly, petitioner be released on bail. As such, petitioner, namely, Akli Begum @ Akilma Begum be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Bongaon.

If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of North 24 Parganas without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court.

Additionally, petitioner shall furnish her address where she would be residing and shall make herself available as when inspected by the Bagdah Police Station.

With the aforesaid observations, CRM (R) 111 of 2026 is allowed.

Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead