Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2533/2026 of PALASH DAS AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 October 2026
17 Court No.550 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(M) 2533 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No. 879 of 2026
14.10.2026
Sl. No. 17
Court No.550
Rohan
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(M) 2533 of 2026
In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No. 879 of 2026 dated 13.08.2026 under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/308(5)/109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Palash Das & Anr.
…Petitioners
Mr. Sabir Ahmed
Mr. Quazi Ezaz Ahmed
…for the Petitioners
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das
Mr. Narattam Acharyya
… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Report submitted by the learned counsel for the State is kept with the record.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the State.
3. It appears that the present petitioners were not named in the FIR. It is further found that the principal accused persons are in custody. The FIR does not disclose anything and further, it appears from the C.D. that the present petitioners are the associates of the principal accused. Investigation has progressed to a considerable extent and nothing has been seized from the present petitioners. As such, I find that there is no need for keeping the petitioners in custody.
4. Accordingly, the application for bail of the petitioners, namely, Palash Das and Prokash Das is allowed.
2
5. I direct the petitioners will be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be a local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnanagar, Nadia. The petitioners shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every day of substantive hearing subject to the provisions of Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Section 355 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. The petitioners shall not enter the jurisdiction of Kotwali Police Station except for the purpose of attending Court and shall furnish their current local address where they shall reside to the learned Trial Court and shall meet the Investigating Officer as and when called for until further orders.
6. In the event, the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions as stated above, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.
7. Thus, the application for bail being C.R.M. (M) 2533 of 2026 stands disposed of.
8. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Hon’ble Court.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)