CRM(M)/2135/2026 of IDRIS ALI @ IDRISH ALI @ MITHUN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 October 2026

1. The learned advocate representing petitioner submitted the petitioner to have been falsely implicated in the instant case. The petitioner is in custody for 9 months and 3 days. It was further submitted that the co-accuseds had been released on bail. The learned advocate representing the petitioner seeks the prayer for bail on the aforesaid ground of falsely implication and detention.

2. The learned advocate representing the State opposed the prayer for grant of bail stressing the present petitioner to have murdered the victim and the offending weapon had been recovered on his leading statement of the present petitioner. The co-accuseds to have been grant bail was not on similar circumstances as that of the present petitioner.

3. Considering the narrative in the complaint, the statements recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, 183 of the BNSS, the seizure list of the postmortem and call details

2 which refer to the incriminating act of the present petitioner in the alleged offence being severe in nature. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is considered and rejected.

4. The memo of evidence filed by the State be taken on record.

5. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 2135 of 2026 is dismissed.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)