CRM (A)/3812/2026 of UMED ALI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 October 2026

14.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 62. Kausik (Rejected)

CRM (A) 3812 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Karandighi Police Station Case No. 385 of 2026 dated 14.07.2026 under Sections 115(2)/117(2)/126(2)/137(2)/140(3)/329(4)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

And

In the matter of : Umed Ali

……Petitioner.

Mr. Kaushik Choudhury

…..for the Petitioner.

Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Ld. APP

Ms. Tanusree Kar

….for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case.

State has produced the case diary, drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS.

I have taken into account the merits of the case which relate to kidnapping for ransom.

2

Having considered that the victim has named the present petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the relief as prayed for.

As such, prayer for anticipatory bail in CRM (A) 3812 of 2026 is rejected.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)