Calcutta High Court
WPA/25325/2026 of SK. SADDAM @ SEKH SADDAM @ SADDAM SEIKH AND ORS. Vs THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 14 October 2026
High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side 14.10.2026 Item No.66 Court No.21 MKP WPA/25325/2026 SK. SADDAM @ SEKH SADDAM @ SADDAM SEIKH AND ORS. VS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS. Ms. Faria Hossain, Mr. Asif Dewan, Mr. Mehdi Masud, Ms. Suparna Chatterjee.
In the High Court At Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
14.10.2026
Item No.66
Court No.21
MKP
WPA/25325/2026
SK. SADDAM @ SEKH SADDAM
@ SADDAM SEIKH AND ORS.
VS
THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Ms. Faria Hossain,
Mr. Asif Dewan,
Mr. Mehdi Masud,
Ms. Suparna Chatterjee.
…….… for the Petitioner
Ms. Anamika Pandey.
……for the E.C.I.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Supplementary affidavit has been filed. Copy has been served upon the learned advocate representing the Election Commission Of India. Let it be kept with the record.
2. Through the supplementary affidavit copy of the appeal in respect of the petitioner no.3 has been furnished.
3. The petitioners have the EPIC No.YWL1761063, YWL1761022 and YWL1761048.
4. The learned advocate representing the petitioners submits that deficit Court-fee has been paid and copy of the receipt has been filed, let it be kept with the record.
5. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition seeking an appropriate order be passed so that conscionable justice may be done and now the Learned advocate representing the petitioners seeks direction as to the fact that the appeal preferred before the Tribunal be disposed of at the earliest.
6. Heard the learned advocate and on perusal of the record and considering the submission of the Learned advocate, it transpires that the petitioners have sought for early disposal of their grievance.
7. This Court has not gone into the merit of the case.
8. In view of the aforementioned discussion, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioners as early as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal.
9. WPA 25325 of 2026 is disposed of.
10. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)