Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/2063/2026 of ELEZA KHATOON @ SORINA KHATOON Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 October 2026

ct 33 C.R.M.(M) No. 2063 of 2026 sl no. 3 cm In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Petrapole Police Station Case No.73 of 2025 dated 04.08.2025 Sections 319(2)/338/336(3)/340(2) BNS, read with Section 14A(b)

14.10.2026

ct 33

C.R.M.(M) No. 2063 of 2026

sl no. 3

cm

In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Petrapole Police Station Case No.73

of dated

04.08.2025

Sections

319(2)/338/336(3)/340(2) BNS, read with Section 14A(b) Foreigners Act.

And

In Re : Eleza Khatoon @ Sorina Khatoon

….. petitioner

Mr. Sunny Nandy

Ms. Riya Das

Ms. Yamini Tiwari

…… for the petitioner

Mr. Priyankar Ganguly

Ms. Shalini Bairagi

…… for the State

1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submitted the petitioner is in custody for 434 days. The petitioner is claimed come to India from Bangladesh since 2015 and thereafter married to an Indian National. Considering the period of detention and the marriage to an Indian National, the learned advocate representing the petitioner claimed the prayer for bail.

2. The learned advocate representing the State submitted the present petitioner who had illegally entered into India with valid documents including passport being Bangladeshi National and thereafter did not return. The next date had been fixed for recording evidence of C.S.W. 1, 2, 3 and 4 on 27th November, 2026 and 30th November, 2026.

3. Considering the gravity of the instant case and that the petitioner being admittedly a Bangladeshi National. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is considered and rejected.

4. Trial court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties disregarding any cease work if any by the local bar.

5. The memo of evidence filed by the State be taken on record.

6. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 2063 of 2026 is dismissed.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead