Calcutta High Court
WPA/19061/2026 of DILWAR HOSSAIN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 October 2026
2026 Item no.D/L 21 Court No. 24 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 19061 of 2026 In the matter of : Dilwar Hossain …. Petitioner VS. The State of West Bengal & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner:
14th Oct., 2026
Item no.D/L 21
Court No. 24
Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Case No.
WPA 19061 of 2026
In the matter of:
Dilwar Hossain
…. Petitioner
VS.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
….Respondents
For the Petitioner:
Mr. Sakti Pada Jana
Mr. Subhajyoti Das
….Advocates
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appears on behalf of the State respondents.
2. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.
3. The prayer of the petitioner for service continuation and pay protection forwarded by the District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Birbhum is pending consideration before the Commissioner of School Education for a considerable period of time.
4. The petitioner prays for a direction upon the Commissioner to consider his prayer.
5. As it appears that the prayer of the petitioner is already pending consideration before the Commissioner of School Education, accordingly, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Commissioner of School Education to take a decision on the request forwarded by the District Inspector of Schools on 28th August, 2025 strictly in accordance with law at the earliest but positively within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order.
Page 2
7. The Commissioner shall pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner.
8. Learned advocate representing the petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the communication of the District Inspector of Schools, dated 28th August, 2025 along with all supporting documents to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of this Court.
9. The writ petition stands disposed of.
10. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
11. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)