Calcutta High Court

WPA/4262/2026 of JAYANTA BHADRA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 October 2026

AD/11/18 266312 NANDY (CO-DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/4262/2026 JAYANTA BHADRA VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Ms. Susmita Dey (Basu), Advocate Mr. Kaustav Ghosh, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Mr. N.C. Bihani, Sr.

AD/11/18

266312

NANDY

(CO-DO)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

WPA/4262/2026

JAYANTA BHADRA

VS

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Ms. Susmita Dey (Basu), Advocate

Mr. Kaustav Ghosh, Advocate

……for the Petitioner

Mr. N.C. Bihani, Sr. Advocate

Mr. Soumyojit Ghosh, Advocate

……for the CSTC

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

2. The petitioner is a retired employee of Calcutta State Transport Corporation (CSTC). He retired from service on attaining his normal age of superannuation on 31.03.2025.

3. The petitioner alleges that he has not received his provident fund dues till date. The petitioner prays for his entire provident fund dues along with interest.

4. Reliance has been placed on an order dated January 15, 2026 passed by this Court in WPA/28860/2025.

5. As provident fund is a statutory due of a retired employee; accordingly, the employer is duty bound to disburse the same immediately on retirement of the employee or soon thereafter. There ought not to have been any delay in disbursing the terminal dues of a retired employee.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Managing Director, CSTC to take steps to release the entire provident fund dues to the petitioner.

P a g e | 2

Page 1 of 2

7. As the retired employee will receive the terminal dues after some delay, the amount shall be disbursed along with simple interest calculated at the rate of 6% per annum from the date after the retirement till the date of actual payment within twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order.

8. It is made clear that if the amount is not disbursed within the aforesaid time limit, then the petitioner would be entitled to receive 2% additional interest i.e. 6%+2% = 8% interest on the due amount calculated on and from the next date of retirement till the date of actual payment.

9. In the event, at the time of disbursement, the authorities do not have sufficient funds, the State authorities are directed to disburse the concerned amount in favour of the respondent no. 5.

10. The writ petition stands disposed of.

11. Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

P a g e | 3

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead