Calcutta High Court
WPA/30285/2026 of ARPITA DAS AND ORS Vs THE MISSION DIRECTOR, PBRSSM, GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL on 14 October 2026
Court No. 24 pg. In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 30285 of 2026 Arpita Das & Ors. VS. The Mission Director, Paschim Banga Rajya Shishu Shiksha Mission Mr. Bidhan Biswas … For the petitioners Mr. Md. Sarwar Jahan Ms. Mousumi Mitra
14.10.2026
Court No. 24
pg.
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA 30285 of 2026
Arpita Das & Ors.
VS.
The Mission Director, Paschim Banga
Rajya Shishu Shiksha Mission
Mr. Bidhan Biswas
… For the petitioners
Mr. Md. Sarwar Jahan
Ms. Mousumi Mitra
Ms. Tapati SArkar
Mr. Aritra Ranjan Dutta Roy
… For the Mission Director
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service and the receipt showing submission of deficit court fees filed in Court today are taken on record.
2. The petitioners were initially serving as Sahayak/Sahayika in Shishu Shiksha Kendra. They exercised option to avail the benefit given in favour of Para Teachers.
3. The benefit of Para Teacher to be given to the Sahayak/Sahayika was, on publication of the notification, found to be not beneficial. The petitioners, accordingly, intend to be reverted back to the status of Sahayak/Sahayika and they intend to remain in service till 65 years of age.
4. Various writ petitions on similar facts were considered by the Court and the Court by judgment dated 27th September, 2024 passed in WPA 24808 of
2024 (Antara Pandit & Ors –Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.) directed the concerned State authorities including PBRSSM authorities to treat the petitioners as Sahayak/Sahayika and the option submitted by them to be treated as Para Teacher has been directed to be treated as cancelled.
5. As the facts of the case are similar to the case of Antara Pandit (supra), accordingly, in line with the above judgment, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Mission Director to treat the petitioners as Sahayak/Sahayika and permit them to remain in service till 65 years of age.
6. No benefit in respect of Para Teacher will be allowed in their favour.
7. The writ petition stands disposed of.
8. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
9. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)