Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2146/2026 of TARAK GURIA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 14 October 2026
cm ct 33 C.R.M. (M) 2146 of 2026 sl no.8 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Maidan P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 dated 10.04.2026 Sections 123/3(5)/351(1)/70(1)/87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Allowed In Re :
14.10.2026
cm
ct 33
C.R.M. (M) 2146 of 2026
sl no.8
In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Maidan P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 dated 10.04.2026 Sections 123/3(5)/351(1)/70(1)/87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Allowed
In Re : Tarak Guria.
….. petitioner
Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee
Mr. Akash Deep Mukherjee
Mr. Tirupati Mukherjee
Mr. Soujanya Pattanyak
…… for the petitioner
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, Ld. A.P.P.
Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi
…. for the State
Mr. Naiaz Mohammad
…… for the de-facto complainant
Page 1 of 2
1. The petitioner seeks for grant of bail.
2. The prayer for grant of bail had been vehemently opposed by the learned advocates representing the de-facto complainant and the State.
3. The petitioner had been in custody for 148 days being arrested on 17.05.2026. The victim being an adult lady had refused to undergo medical examination. The charge-sheet in the instant case has already been submitted, further custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in the instant case and the prayer for bail of the petitioner is considered and allowed.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Calcutta on condition that the petitioner
2 shall appear before the Trial Court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition petitioner shall meet the local police station once in a week until further orders. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission.
5. In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.
6. The memo of evidence filed by the State be taken on record.
7. The application being CRM(M) No. 2146 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…