Calcutta High Court

WPA/27885/2026 of BRIJ MOHAN SINGH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 October 2026

23 sdas WPA 27885 of 2026 Sri Brij Mohan Singh Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Subit Kumar Mandal ……. for the petitioner Mr. Piyush Chaturvedi, learned SGA Mr. Tarun Kumar Jana ……. for the State 1. Let affidavit- of -service, as filed in Court, be kept

14.10.2026

sdas

WPA 27885 of 2026

Sri Brij Mohan Singh

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Subit Kumar Mandal

……. for the petitioner

Mr. Piyush Chaturvedi, learned SGA

Mr. Tarun Kumar Jana

……. for the State

1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved that his application for appointment on compassionate ground, on the death of his father, has been kept pending since 2015. The petitioner’s application was duly considered by a three-member Committee and the petitioner was found to be eligible for such appointment. In fact, the recommendation was also made by the authorities sometime in 2018 to approve appointment of the petitioner on compassionate ground.

3. On February 27, 2019, the eligibility of the candidate was duly approved for appointment in a Group-D post, under the exempted category in terms of Notification No. 251-Emp. dated December 3, 2013 and 26-Emp. dated March 1, 2016. In spite of this finding by the authorities successively and approval

Page 1 of 2

thereof, the petitioner has not been appointed till date.

4. The entire purpose of appointment on compassionate ground is to enable the family of a deceased employee to come out of the condition of financial penury and extend assistance to such family.

5. The delay in appointment of the petitioner is without any reason.

6. In view thereof, the Additional Chief Secretary, Government of West Bengal, Home and Hill Affairs Department, is directed to provide the requisite letter of appointment to the petitioner in terms of the approval dated November 27, 2019, within a period of six weeks from date. The petitioner will be assigned to the requisite duty by the concerned authority upon receipt of such appointment.

7. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

8. There will be no order as to costs.

9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead