Calcutta High Court

WPA/29753/2026 of ANUPAM BANERJEE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 October 2026

Court No.24 pg. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 29753 of 2026 Anupam Banerjee -versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Shamim ul Bari Ms. Asmita Mitra … For the petitioner Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee Mr. Anjan Chakraborty Mr.

14.10.2026

Court No.24

pg.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

WPA 29753 of 2026

Anupam Banerjee

-versus

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Shamim ul Bari

Ms. Asmita Mitra

… For the petitioner

Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee

Mr. Anjan Chakraborty

Mr. Sagnik Roy Chowdhury

… For the State

Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy

… For the WBCSSC

Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya

Mr. Bibek Dutta

… For WBBSE

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the recommendation letter for reinstatement in his previous post issued by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission on 28th January, 2026.

2. The petitioner was a teacher of the normal section of the school. Though the recommendation letter mentions for reinstatement in classes IX-X/XI-XII but the school where the petitioner has actually been appointed by the Board of Secondary Education on 5th March, 2026 is an upper primary school. The petitioner is aggrieved by the same.

3.

Prayer

has been made to direct the Commission to re-recommend the petitioner to any school with matching vacancy.

Page 1 of 2

4. A detailed representation dated 10th September, 2026 by the petitioner to the Commissioner of School Education, West Bengal has been submitted, but the same is alleged to be pending consideration.

5. As the issue is allegedly pending consideration before the Commissioner of School Education, West Bengal, accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by directing the Commissioner to take a decision on the petitioner’s prayer for re-recommendation to a school with matching vacancy in accordance with law at the earliest but positively within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order.

6. If the prayer of the petitioner is accepted, then necessary consequential steps shall be taken by the authority.

7. The Commissioner shall take note of the medical issues confronted by the petitioner’s wife at the time of taking final decision in the matter.

8. Let a copy of the subject representation along with all supporting documents be forwarded to the Commissioner of School Education at the time of communicating the order of the Court.

9. The writ petition stands disposed of.

10. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

11. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead