Calcutta High Court

WPA/28224/2026 of KUTUBUDDIN SAFUI @ KUDUBUDDIN SANPUI Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 October 2026

Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 28224 of 2026 Kutubuddin Safui @ Kutubuddin Sanpui Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Debapriya Majumder …for the petitioner Ms. Antara Das Mr. Sagar Das …for the respondent nos. 4 to 8 Mr. Sankar Prasad Dalapati Mr. Madhu Jana Mr. Rahul

14.10.2026

Ct. No. 05

adeb

WPA 28224 of 2026

Kutubuddin Safui @ Kutubuddin Sanpui

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Debapriya Majumder

…for the petitioner

Ms. Antara Das

Mr. Sagar Das

…for the respondent nos. 4 to 8

Mr. Sankar Prasad Dalapati

Mr. Madhu Jana

Mr. Rahul Agarwala

….for the State

1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record.

2. Prayer is made for directing police authorities to take necessary steps based on subsequent complaint which was received by concerned police authority on 23rd September, 2026. In addition thereto, it is also submitted that petitioner filed Title Suit No. 1817 of 2025 wherein an ad interim order of injunction was passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), 7th Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas thereby restraining defendant nos. 1 and 2 from dispossessing the plaintiffs of suit property and plaintiffs and defendant nos. 1 and 2 were directed to maintain status quo. Prayer is also made for providing protection to petitioner.

3. State respondents are represented by Mr. Sankar Prasad Dalapati, learned Additional

Page 1 of 4

Government Pleader who has opposed this writ petition and it is submitted that issue involved in this writ petition is civil in nature. According to State respondents if suit is pending petitioner is required to approach Civil Court.

4. On perusal of complaint which is at pages 24 and 25 of writ petition it appears that miscreants allegedly damaged house of petitioner on 17th September, 2026 which was brought to notice of concerned police authority giving rise to criminal prosecution being Chandaneswar Police Station Case No. 177 of

Page 2 of 4

dated 18th September, 2026. Subsequently, complaint which is at pages 24 and 25 of writ petition was sent by registered post reporting looting of valuable items on 18th September, 2026 by the miscreants.

5. Based on complaint dated 17th September, 2026 since FIR has been registered on 18th September, 2026 concerned police authorities are directed to investigate the case and take the same to its logical conclusion. If petitioner finds that subsequent complaint which was received by police authorities on 23rd September, 2026 needs to be taken into consideration for registering FIR and which has not been done, petitioner is at liberty to approach jurisdictional Magistrate under

Page 3 of 4

Section 175(3) BNSS 2023 seeking registration of FIR.

6. Moreover, in pending suit instituted by petitioner being Title Suit No. 1817 of 2025 order was passed restraining respondents from dispossessing the petitioner being plaintiff therein of premises in question and to maintain status quo. If petitioner finds that said ad interim order of injunction dated 26th November, 2025 still subsists and same is violated petitioner shall be at liberty to approach Civil Court in pursuit of remedy.

7. With the aforesaid observations writ petition stands disposed of.

8. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

Page 4 of 4

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead