Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/2182/2026 of KANGSHA PRAMANIK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 14 October 2026

Court No.33. (Pritam) (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (M) 2182 of 2026. In Re: An application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in

13.

14.10.2026.

Court

No.33. (Pritam)

(Allowed)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

CRM (M) 2182 of 2026.

In Re: An application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Rahara Police Station Case No.219/2025 dated 04.08.2025

Sections

25(1a)/25(1b)(a)/25(1b)/25(ia)/25(1aa)/25(6)/27(7)/25(8)/27/29/

30/25 of the Arms Act.

In the matter of: - KANGSHA PRAMANIK.

..…petitioner.

Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv.,

Mr. Dipanjan Datta,

Mr. Tanmoy Chowdhury,

Mr. Tamal Taru Panda.

..…for the petitioner.

Mr. Ayan Basu,

Mr. Goutam Banerjee.

..…for the State.

Page 1 of 2

1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submitted the present petitioner to have been arrested on 8th August, 2025 and two country-made pistols had been recovered from his possession at the time of arrest. He also indicated to three of the co-accused, namely, Sudip Daw, Subrata Daw and Abhir Daw to have been granted bail by a Co-ordinate bench of this court on 9th October, 2025.

2. The learned advocate representing the State opposed the prayer for grant of bail.

2

3. Considering the period of detention and the fact that the co- accused persons had already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate bench dated 9th October, 2025 in CRM(M) 1968 of 2025, the present petitioner is enlarged on bail.

4. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas, on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition the petitioner shall meet the jurisdictional police station thrice a week, until further orders. The petitioner shall also not leave the jurisdiction of the trial court without prior permission.

5. In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.

6. The application being CRM(M) No. 2182 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of.

7. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead