Calcutta High Court
WPA/25379/2026 of PARVIN KHATUN @ PARVIN SEIKH AND ORS Vs ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS on 13 October 2026
High Court At Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side 13.10.2026 Item No.219 Court No.21 MKP WPA/25379/2026 PARVIN KHATUN @ PARVIN SEIKH AND ORS VS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS. Ms. Faria Hossain, Mr. Asif Dewan, Mr. Mehdi Masud, Ms. Suparna Chatterjee.
In the High Court At Calcutta
Civil Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
13.10.2026
Item No.219
Court No.21
MKP
WPA/25379/2026
PARVIN KHATUN @ PARVIN SEIKH AND ORS
VS
THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Ms. Faria Hossain,
Mr. Asif Dewan,
Mr. Mehdi Masud,
Ms. Suparna Chatterjee.
…….… for the Petitioners
Mr. Mukunda Lal Sarkar.
……….for the State
Mrs. Anamika Pandey.
……for the E.C.I
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioners have the EPIC Nos.YWL1846351, YWL2070993 and YWL1761055.
2. The learned advocate representing the petitioners submits that deficit Court-fee has been paid and copy of the receipt has been filed, let it be kept with the record.
3. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition seeking an appropriate order be passed so that conscionable justice may be done and now the Learned advocate representing the petitioner seeks direction as to the fact that the appeal preferred before the Tribunal be disposed of at the earliest.
4. Heard the learned advocate and on perusal of the record and considering the submission of the Learned advocate, it transpires that the petitioners have sought for early disposal of his grievance.
5. This Court has not gone into the merit of the case.
6. In view of the aforementioned discussion, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioners as early as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal.
7. WPA 25379 of 2026 is disposed of.
8. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)